Skip to content

Video Encoder Cpu Or Gpu (Explained)

    ✅ Fact Checked
    Updated on January 27, 2023
    John Chad, Bachelor Computer Science Degree & Computer Engineering.
    Written by
    John Chad, Bachelor Degree in Computer Science & Computer Engineering.
    Russel Collins
    Fact Checked by
    Russel Collins
    John is a certified IT & Computer Engineer with a Bachelors Degree. He has worked for a International Insurance Company in the IT department before deciding to become a full time blogger to help his readers. Holds a Bachelors Degree in Computer Science from Stanford University.

    Fun Fact
    Did you know that the first CPU, or central processing unit, was created by Intel in 1971 and was called the Intel 4004? It was only capable of processing 60,000 instructions per second and had a clock speed of only 740 kHz. Nowadays, CPUs can process billions of instructions per second and have clock speeds of several gigahertz. Pretty crazy, right?
    Hey there!

    Video encoding is an important task that requires a significant amount of processing power. Whether you’re a professional video editor or a casual content creator, the hardware you choose for encoding can have a big impact on the quality and speed of your final product. So, the question is: should you use a CPU or a GPU for video encoding?

    Well, in simple terms, a CPU (Central Processing Unit) is the “brain” of a computer, responsible for running software and performing general tasks. On the other hand, a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) is specialized hardware that is designed to handle the complex calculations needed for rendering graphics and video.

    Both CPUs and GPUs can handle video encoding, but they approach the task in different ways, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at the pros and cons of using a CPU or a GPU for video encoding, and help you decide which hardware is best for your needs. And remember, the answer is not always clear cut, different tasks and projects may require different hardware.

    1CPU Video Encoding

    When it comes to video encoding, the Central Processing Unit (CPU) is the traditional go-to choice for many professionals and hobbyists alike. But why is that? Well, let’s take a closer look.

    First of all, it’s important to understand that a CPU is the “brain” of a computer – it’s responsible for running software and performing general tasks. When it comes to video encoding, the CPU takes the raw video footage and compresses it into a format that can be easily shared or played back on different devices.

    One of the advantages of using a CPU for video encoding is its flexibility. Because CPUs are general-purpose processors, they can handle a wide range of encoding tasks and work with a variety of software. This means that you can use the same hardware for encoding different types of video, such as H.264, H.265, and VP9. Additionally, many software encoders are optimized for CPU-based encoding, so you’ll likely have a wider range of options to choose from.

    However, there are also some disadvantages to consider. For one, CPU-based encoding can be less performant than other options. Because CPUs are juggling multiple tasks at once, they may not be able to devote as much power to encoding as specialized hardware. Additionally, because video encoding is a power-intensive task, using a CPU can result in increased power consumption and heat generation, which may be an issue for some users.

    So, what does all this mean for you? Well, if you’re a professional video editor or a casual content creator, the hardware you choose for encoding can have a big impact on the quality and speed of your final product. And, while CPU-based encoding has its advantages and disadvantages, it can be a solid choice for many users. With a wide range of software options and a flexible approach, a CPU can be a great way to handle your video encoding needs.

    2GPU Video Encoding

    When it comes to video encoding, you’ve probably heard of using a CPU (Central Processing Unit) to handle the task. But have you ever considered using a GPU (Graphics Processing Unit)?

    Let’s start with a quick overview of how a CPU handles video encoding. It’s the brain of your computer and it’s responsible for managing all the tasks that go on in your machine, including video encoding. The CPU is a general-purpose processor, meaning it can handle a wide range of tasks, making it a great option for video encoding because it can handle a wide range of software.

    However, there are some downsides to using a CPU for video encoding. One major disadvantage is that it’s not as powerful as a GPU. This means that a CPU may not be able to handle high-resolution videos or multiple streams of video at the same time. Additionally, because a CPU handles a wide range of tasks, it can consume a lot of power, which can be a concern for some users.

    Now let’s take a look at how a GPU handles video encoding. A GPU is specifically designed to handle graphics-intensive tasks like video encoding. It’s specifically tailored to handle these types of tasks and it’s built to handle large amounts of data quickly and efficiently. This makes a GPU a great option for video encoding, especially when it comes to high-resolution videos or multiple streams of video.

    There are also some advantages to using a GPU for video encoding. One major advantage is that it’s much more powerful than a CPU, which means it can handle high-resolution videos and multiple streams of video with ease. Additionally, because a GPU is specifically designed for graphics-intensive tasks, it’s much more power-efficient than a CPU. This means that it uses less power to handle the same amount of work as a CPU.

    However, there are also some downsides to using a GPU for video encoding. One major disadvantage is that it’s not as flexible as a CPU. A GPU is specialized for graphics-intensive tasks, which means it may not be able to handle as wide a range of software as a CPU. Additionally, because a GPU is a specialized piece of hardware, it may require specialized hardware requirements, such as a compatible motherboard or power supply.

    In short, both CPU and GPU have their own advantages and disadvantages when it comes to video encoding. A CPU is a general-purpose processor that can handle a wide range of software and tasks, but it’s not as powerful as a GPU. A GPU is specifically designed for graphics-intensive tasks and it’s much more powerful, but it may not be able to handle as wide a range of software as a CPU. Ultimately, the choice between a CPU or GPU for video encoding depends on your specific needs and requirements.

    3Comparison of CPU and GPU for Video Encoding

    When it comes to video encoding, both CPUs and GPUs have their own set of advantages and disadvantages. Let’s take a look at an overview of how each handles video encoding, as well as the pros and cons of using them.

    When it comes to CPUs, their main advantage is their flexibility and compatibility with a wide range of software. This means that you can use a CPU for a variety of video encoding tasks and it will work well. However, the downside is that performance may be lower, and power consumption is generally higher.

    On the other hand, GPUs are known for their higher performance and more efficient power usage. They are specifically designed to handle the complex calculations required for video encoding, so they can get the job done faster and with less energy. The downside is that they may have limited software compatibility and require specialized hardware.

    So, which one should you choose? It really depends on the specific task at hand. For example, if you’re working with high-resolution video or need real-time encoding, a GPU is probably your best bet. But if you’re working with a wide range of video formats and need compatibility with a variety of software, a CPU might be a better choice.

    It’s also important to note that advancements in hardware and software are constantly impacting the capabilities of both CPUs and GPUs for video encoding. For example, new software may allow a CPU to perform certain tasks faster, or new hardware may improve the performance of a GPU. So, it’s always a good idea to keep an eye on the latest developments and choose the option that best fits your needs.

    In short, both CPUs and GPUs have their own strengths and weaknesses when it comes to video encoding. It’s important to carefully consider the specific task at hand and choose the option that best fits your needs, taking into account the current state of hardware and software advancements. And remember, whether you’re using a CPU or GPU, performance and power efficiency will always be trade-offs, it’s important to find a balance that fits your specific needs.

    FAQ

    Should I use GPU or CPU for video encoder medal?

    It is generally recommended to use a GPU for video encoding tasks. This is because GPUs are specifically designed to handle the types of complex mathematical calculations required for video encoding, such as those used in compression algorithms. They also have a large number of cores, which allows for parallel processing and can greatly speed up the encoding process.

    Additionally, many video encoding libraries, such as FFmpeg and x264, have built-in support for GPU acceleration, making it easier to utilize the capabilities of a GPU for encoding tasks.

    While it is possible to use a CPU for video encoding, it will likely be less efficient and take longer to complete the task. In general, a GPU is a better choice for video encoding tasks.

    Should I use CPU or GPU for encoding OBS?

    It is generally recommended to use a GPU for encoding with OBS. This is because the encoding process can be very demanding on the system resources, especially when streaming at high resolutions or high frame rates. A GPU is specifically designed to handle the types of complex mathematical calculations required for video encoding, such as those used in compression algorithms. They also have a large number of cores, which allows for parallel processing and can greatly speed up the encoding process.

    Additionally, OBS software has built-in support for GPU acceleration, which allows users to utilize the capabilities of a GPU for encoding tasks.

    However, using a CPU for encoding with OBS is still possible but it will likely be less efficient and take longer to complete the task. This is because CPU’s are not as powerful as GPU’s when it comes to handling mathematical calculations and are not built for parallel processing.

    In general, a GPU is a better choice for encoding with OBS as it provides better performance and faster encoding speeds.

    Is NVENC CPU or GPU?

    NVENC (Nvidia Video Encoder) is a GPU-based video encoding technology developed by Nvidia. It is designed to offload video encoding from the CPU to the GPU, which can improve performance and reduce the load on the CPU. NVENC is implemented in Nvidia’s CUDA programming model and utilizes the parallel processing capabilities of the GPU to accelerate video encoding.

    In summary, NVENC is a GPU-based video encoding technology that is specifically designed to accelerate video encoding by offloading the task from the CPU to the GPU. It utilizes the parallel processing capabilities of the GPU to improve performance and reduce the load on the CPU.

    Does CPU or GPU decode video?

    Both the CPU and GPU can decode video, but the specific process and the load each component carries can vary depending on the specific type of video codec used.

    Video codecs are algorithms used for compressing and decompressing video files. Some codecs are designed to be more efficient and can be decoded using minimal processing power from the CPU, while other codecs are more computationally demanding and require more powerful processing capabilities.

    Typically, the CPU is responsible for decoding the video codec and handling the other processes associated with video playback, such as audio decoding and displaying the video on the screen. However, some modern codecs like H.264 and HEVC can take advantage of the GPU’s parallel processing capabilities, which allows the GPU to assist the CPU in decoding the video. This can significantly improve the performance and reduce the load on the CPU.

    In summary, both the CPU and GPU can decode video, but the specific process and the load each component carries can vary depending on the specific type of video codec used.

    5Conclusion

    In conclusion, the choice between a CPU or GPU for video encoding ultimately depends on the specific needs and requirements of the task at hand. Both have their own set of advantages and disadvantages, with the CPU offering flexibility and compatibility with a wide range of software, and the GPU providing higher performance and more efficient power usage.

    It’s important to note that a detailed comparison of the pros and cons of using a CPU or GPU for video encoding can provide a clear understanding of which one is best suited for the task. Furthermore, specific types of video encoding tasks may require one over the other. For example, tasks that require heavy parallel processing, such as real-time video transcoding, would likely benefit from a GPU.

    Additionally, the current state of hardware and software advancements are continuously impacting the capabilities of both CPU and GPU in video encoding. As technology advances, the gap between the performance of a CPU and GPU in video encoding may continue to narrow, making the decision between the two even more difficult.

    In the end, it’s a good idea to experiment with both and see which one works best for your specific needs. With the right hardware and software, you can achieve professional-grade video encoding results with either a CPU or GPU.